<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Funny Duplicates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.polarrose.com/2008/08/funny-duplicates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.polarrose.com/2008/08/funny-duplicates/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: beniguet</title>
		<link>http://blog.polarrose.com/2008/08/funny-duplicates/#comment-109128</link>
		<dc:creator>beniguet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.polarrose.com/?p=75#comment-109128</guid>
		<description>That's all very well. 
How come, however, that for the same person (say Barack Obama), there can be numerous stacks, with the same name and the same face, and sometimes at least one common photo, and they don't collapse in one single stack ?
In one same stack the algorithm properly finds very different photos of the same person. I do not really understand the rule here. Could someone please explain this a litlle more ?
Thanks in advance.

Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s all very well. <br />
How come, however, that for the same person (say Barack Obama), there can be numerous stacks, with the same name and the same face, and sometimes at least one common photo, and they don&#8217;t collapse in one single stack ?<br />
In one same stack the algorithm properly finds very different photos of the same person. I do not really understand the rule here. Could someone please explain this a litlle more ?<br />
Thanks in advance.</p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
